The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic? by Slavoj Žižek

By Slavoj Žižek

"What concerns isn't a lot that Žižek is endorsing a demythologized, dissatisfied Christianity with out transcendence, as that he's supplying in spite of everything (despite what he occasionally claims) a heterodox model of Christian belief."--John Milbank

"To positioned it much more bluntly, my declare is that it's Milbank who's successfully to blame of heterodoxy, finally of a regression to paganism: in my atheism, i'm extra Christian than Milbank."--Slavoj Žižek

In this nook, thinker Slavoj Žižek, a militant atheist who represents the critical-materialist stance opposed to religion's illusions; within the different nook, "Radical Orthodox" theologian John Milbank, an influential and provocative philosopher who argues that theology is the one starting place upon which wisdom, politics, and ethics can stand. within the Monstrosity of Christ, Žižek and Milbank move nose to nose for 3 rounds, using a magnificent arsenal of strikes to boost their positions and press their respective merits. by way of the last bell, they've got not just confirmed themselves worthwhile adversaries, they've got proven that religion and cause should not easily and intractably hostile. Žižek has lengthy been attracted to the emancipatory strength provided through Christian theology. And Milbank, seeing international capitalism because the new century's maximum moral problem, has driven his personal ontology in additional political and materialist instructions. Their debate within the Monstrosity of Christ issues the way forward for faith, secularity, and political wish in mild of a monsterful event--God turning into human. For the 1st time on account that Žižek's flip towards theology, we now have a real debate among an atheist and a theologian concerning the very which means of theology, Christ, the Church, the Holy Ghost, Universality, and the principles of good judgment. the outcome is going some distance past the popularized atheist/theist point/counterpoint of modern books via Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and others. Žižek starts off, and Milbank solutions, countering dialectics with "paradox." the talk facilities at the nature of and relation among paradox and parallax, among analogy and dialectics, among transcendent glory and liberation. Slavoj Žižek is a thinker and cultural critic. He has released over thirty books, together with having a look Awry, The Puppet and the Dwarf, and The Parallax View (these 3 released via the MIT Press). John Milbank is an influential Christian theologian and the writer of Theology and Social idea: past Secular cause and different books. Creston Davis, who conceived of this stumble upon, studied below either Žižek and Milbank.

Show description

Read or Download The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic? PDF

Best churches & church leadership books


Within the yr 2098, humanity has driven past Earth into the sunlight process and unlocked the secrets and techniques of lifestyles with genetic engineering. yet regardless of the lifesaving remedies and actual advancements wrought through the mastery over human DNA, a few ponder the tinkering with genes an abomination and vow to ruin it.

Journey into the Heart of God: Living the Liturgical Year

Trip into the guts of God is a charming exploration of the background and evolution of the Church 12 months: the cycle of seasons within the Christian culture that starts with introduction and culminates with Easter and is marked via the celebrations of saints, ceremonial dinner days, and the examining of Scripture as appointed via the Church.


A few everyone is worse off than others. Does this truth supply upward push to ethical crisis? Egalitarianism claims that it does, for a wide range of purposes. it truly is some of the most very important and hotly debated difficulties in ethical and political philosophy, occupying a principal position within the paintings of John Rawls, Thomas Nagel, G.

Extra info for The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic?

Example text

John Milbank, Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (London: Routledge, 2003), p. 105. 19. Just to be precise, the point is that the coherence of secular reason presupposes the absence of God, while the coherence of religious faith presupposes God’s presence. Neither side can address the other’s presuppositions. As Žižek points out, the deadlock is that neither side wants to “believe,” but only to know. Thanks to Joshua Delpech-Ramey for several discussions on this. 20. Slavoj Žižek, The Indivisible Remainder: An Essay on Schelling and Related Matters (London: Verso, 1996), pp.

Do those who call themselves “Christians” not prefer to stay with the comfortable image of God sitting up there, benevolently watching over our lives, sending us his son as a token of his love, or, even more comfortably, just with some depersonalized Higher Force? s l av oj ž i ž ek The axiom of this essay is that there is only one philosophy which thought the implications of the four words through to the end: Hegel’s idealism— which is why almost all philosophers are also no less frightened of Hegel’s idealism.

And still more so, the enigma of mourning takes us to the function of the enigma in mourning: what does the dead person want? What does he want of me? What did he want to say to me? 34 Is it not crucial to accomplish this move also apropos of the notion of Dieu obscur, of the elusive, impenetrable God: this God has to be impenetrable also to himself, he has to have a dark side, an otherness in himself, something that is in himself more than himself? Perhaps this accounts for the shift from Judaism to Christianity: Judaism remains at the level of the enigma of God, while Christianity moves to the enigma in God himself.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.12 of 5 – based on 34 votes